Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

An Over-parameterized Exponential Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.16504 v1 pith:WBFALSBH submitted 2023-03-29 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords mathbbtimesactivationexponentialfunctionweightsdatadelta
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Over the past few years, there has been a significant amount of research focused on studying the ReLU activation function, with the aim of achieving neural network convergence through over-parametrization. However, recent developments in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked interest in the use of exponential activation functions, specifically in the attention mechanism. Mathematically, we define the neural function $F: \mathbb{R}^{d \times m} \times \mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ using an exponential activation function. Given a set of data points with labels $\{(x_1, y_1), (x_2, y_2), \dots, (x_n, y_n)\} \subset \mathbb{R}^d \times \mathbb{R}$ where $n$ denotes the number of the data. Here $F(W(t),x)$ can be expressed as $F(W(t),x) := \sum_{r=1}^m a_r \exp(\langle w_r, x \rangle)$, where $m$ represents the number of neurons, and $w_r(t)$ are weights at time $t$. It's standard in literature that $a_r$ are the fixed weights and it's never changed during the training. We initialize the weights $W(0) \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times m}$ with random Gaussian distributions, such that $w_r(0) \sim \mathcal{N}(0, I_d)$ and initialize $a_r$ from random sign distribution for each $r \in [m]$. Using the gradient descent algorithm, we can find a weight $W(T)$ such that $\| F(W(T), X) - y \|_2 \leq \epsilon$ holds with probability $1-\delta$, where $\epsilon \in (0,0.1)$ and $m = \Omega(n^{2+o(1)}\log(n/\delta))$. To optimize the over-parameterization bound $m$, we employ several tight analysis techniques from previous studies [Song and Yang arXiv 2019, Munteanu, Omlor, Song and Woodruff ICML 2022].

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unifying Learning Dynamics and Generalization in Transformers Scaling Law

    cs.LG 2025-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Claims a two-stage transformer scaling law (exponential then C^{-1/6}) with matching bounds, but the lower bounds are missing, the exponent is inconsistent (-1/7 vs -1/6), and the law is an artifact of hand-set M = Θ(...

  2. Only Large Weights (And Not Skip Connections) Can Prevent the Perils of Rank Collapse

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A residual self-attention network with all weight entries bounded by a small η can be approximated by one layer to error O(η)‖X‖∞, so skip connections do not prevent layer collapse.

  3. Universal Approximation of Visual Autoregressive Transformers

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper's headline claim that VAR transformers universally approximate all Lipschitz image maps is not supported, because the theorem restricts the target class and its key lemma has an invalid linearity step.

Pith tools