REVIEW 1 cited by
Scalable High-Quality Hypergraph Partitioning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Scalable High-Quality Hypergraph Partitioning
read the original abstract
Balanced hypergraph partitioning is an NP-hard problem with many applications, e.g., optimizing communication in distributed data placement problems. The goal is to place all nodes across $k$ different blocks of bounded size, such that hyperedges span as few parts as possible. This problem is well-studied in sequential and distributed settings, but not in shared-memory. We close this gap by devising efficient and scalable shared-memory algorithms for all components employed in the best sequential solvers without compromises with regards to solution quality. This work presents the scalable and high-quality hypergraph partitioning framework Mt-KaHyPar. Its most important components are parallel improvement algorithms based on the FM algorithm and maximum flows, as well as a parallel clustering algorithm for coarsening - which are used in a multilevel scheme with $\log(n)$ levels. As additional components, we parallelize the $n$-level partitioning scheme, devise a deterministic version of our algorithm, and present optimizations for plain graphs. We evaluate our solver on more than 800 graphs and hypergraphs, and compare it with 25 different algorithms from the literature. Our fastest configuration outperforms almost all existing hypergraph partitioners with regards to both solution quality and running time. Our highest-quality configuration achieves the same solution quality as the best sequential partitioner KaHyPar, while being an order of magnitude faster with ten threads. Thus, two of our configurations occupy all fronts of the Pareto curve for hypergraph partitioning. Furthermore, our solvers exhibit good speedups, e.g., 29.6x in the geometric mean on 64 cores (deterministic), 22.3x ($\log(n)$-level), and 25.9x ($n$-level).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Efficient Parallel Algorithms for Hypergraph Matching
Local-max hypergraph matching gets O(log m)-round parallel algorithms with a 1/d approximation guarantee, plus a GPU implementation up to 76x faster than a single core.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.