REVIEW 2 cited by
Evaluation Challenges for Geospatial ML
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
As geospatial machine learning models and maps derived from their predictions are increasingly used for downstream analyses in science and policy, it is imperative to evaluate their accuracy and applicability. Geospatial machine learning has key distinctions from other learning paradigms, and as such, the correct way to measure performance of spatial machine learning outputs has been a topic of debate. In this paper, I delineate unique challenges of model evaluation for geospatial machine learning with global or remotely sensed datasets, culminating in concrete takeaways to improve evaluations of geospatial model performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Large-scale School Mapping using Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Universal School Connectivity
A weakly supervised satellite-imagery pipeline locates schools in ten African countries with AUPRC above 0.96 and generates nationwide candidate school maps.
-
The uses (and misuses) of Earth Observation data for weather and vegetation analysis
A practical review of how Earth observation product choice and measurement error can bias geospatial impact evaluations, with guidance for economists.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.