Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-annotator Deep Learning: A Probabilistic Framework for Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.02539 v2 pith:OTIIIEGJ submitted 2023-04-05 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords learningannotatorsdeepmulti-annotatorannotatorclasscorrelatedmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Solving complex classification tasks using deep neural networks typically requires large amounts of annotated data. However, corresponding class labels are noisy when provided by error-prone annotators, e.g., crowdworkers. Training standard deep neural networks leads to subpar performances in such multi-annotator supervised learning settings. We address this issue by presenting a probabilistic training framework named multi-annotator deep learning (MaDL). A downstream ground truth and an annotator performance model are jointly trained in an end-to-end learning approach. The ground truth model learns to predict instances' true class labels, while the annotator performance model infers probabilistic estimates of annotators' performances. A modular network architecture enables us to make varying assumptions regarding annotators' performances, e.g., an optional class or instance dependency. Further, we learn annotator embeddings to estimate annotators' densities within a latent space as proxies of their potentially correlated annotations. Together with a weighted loss function, we improve the learning from correlated annotation patterns. In a comprehensive evaluation, we examine three research questions about multi-annotator supervised learning. Our findings show MaDL's state-of-the-art performance and robustness against many correlated, spamming annotators.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. QuMAB: Query-based Multi-Annotator Behavior Modeling with Reliability under Sparse Labels

    cs.MM 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    QuMAB models each annotator with a lightweight query in a cross-attention network, reconstructs missing labels, and reports accuracy gains over aggregation baselines on two new dense-label datasets.

Pith tools