Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Test your samples jointly: Pseudo-reference for image quality evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.03766 v1 pith:72BDYALS submitted 2023-04-07 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords qualityimagesimagecontentdepictingdifferentestimationfeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we address the well-known image quality assessment problem but in contrast from existing approaches that predict image quality independently for every images, we propose to jointly model different images depicting the same content to improve the precision of quality estimation. This proposal is motivated by the idea that multiple distorted images can provide information to disambiguate image features related to content and quality. To this aim, we combine the feature representations from the different images to estimate a pseudo-reference that we use to enhance score prediction. Our experiments show that at test-time, our method successfully combines the features from multiple images depicting the same new content, improving estimation quality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Computer Vision and Depth Sensor-Powered Smart Cane for Real-Time Obstacle Detection and Navigation Assistance for the Visually Impaired

    q-bio.OT 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A smart cane prototype using RT-DETRv3-R50 and RealSense depth reports 53.4% mAP, 71.7% AP50, and roughly 150 ms latency, with 92.1% correct mobility decisions across 48 trials.

Pith tools