Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Evaluating spintronics-compatible implementations of Ising machines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.04177 v1 pith:U6VOG3H4 submitted 2023-04-09 cond-mat.other

Evaluating spintronics-compatible implementations of Ising machines

classification cond-mat.other
keywords isingmachinescoherentmax-cutproblemscombinatorialconsideringefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The commercial and industrial demand for the solution of hard combinatorial optimization problems push forward the development of efficient solvers. One of them is the Ising machine which can solve combinatorial problems mapped to Ising Hamiltonians. In particular, spintronic hardware implementations of Ising machines can be very efficient in terms of area and performance, and are relatively low-cost considering the potential to create hybrid CMOS-spintronic technology. Here, we perform a comparison of coherent and probabilistic paradigms of Ising machines on several hard Max-Cut instances, analyzing their scalability and performance at software level. We show that probabilistic Ising machines outperform coherent Ising machines in terms of the number of iterations required to achieve the problem s solution. Nevertheless, high frequency spintronic oscillators with sub-nanosecond synchronization times could be very promising as ultrafast Ising machines. In addition, considering that a coherent Ising machine acts better for Max-Cut problems because of the absence of the linear term in the Ising Hamiltonian, we introduce a procedure to encode Max-3SAT to Max-Cut. We foresee potential synergic interplays between the two paradigms.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.