Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

NeuroBench: A Framework for Benchmarking Neuromorphic Computing Algorithms and Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.04640 v5 pith:ULR5TH6L submitted 2023-04-10 cs.AI

Jason Yik , Korneel Van den Berghe , Douwe den Blanken , Younes Bouhadjar , Maxime Fabre , Paul Hueber , Weijie Ke , Mina A Khoei
show 92 more authors
This is my paper
classification cs.AI
keywords neuromorphicbenchmarkcomputingneurobenchframeworkacrossapproachesbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neuromorphic computing shows promise for advancing computing efficiency and capabilities of AI applications using brain-inspired principles. However, the neuromorphic research field currently lacks standardized benchmarks, making it difficult to accurately measure technological advancements, compare performance with conventional methods, and identify promising future research directions. Prior neuromorphic computing benchmark efforts have not seen widespread adoption due to a lack of inclusive, actionable, and iterative benchmark design and guidelines. To address these shortcomings, we present NeuroBench: a benchmark framework for neuromorphic computing algorithms and systems. NeuroBench is a collaboratively-designed effort from an open community of researchers across industry and academia, aiming to provide a representative structure for standardizing the evaluation of neuromorphic approaches. The NeuroBench framework introduces a common set of tools and systematic methodology for inclusive benchmark measurement, delivering an objective reference framework for quantifying neuromorphic approaches in both hardware-independent (algorithm track) and hardware-dependent (system track) settings. In this article, we outline tasks and guidelines for benchmarks across multiple application domains, and present initial performance baselines across neuromorphic and conventional approaches for both benchmark tracks. NeuroBench is intended to continually expand its benchmarks and features to foster and track the progress made by the research community.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EEvAct: Early Event-Based Action Recognition with High-Rate Two-Stream Spiking Neural Networks

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A high-rate two-stream spiking network with a lightweight gated fusion unit achieves 94.9% on THU EACT-50 and enables early prediction within 100 ms.

Pith tools