Pith. Sign in

RECORD

How the Moon Impacts Subsea Communication Cables

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Lothar Moeller

Signal Processing · Submitted 14 Apr 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We report tidal-induced latency variations on a transpacific subsea cable.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2304.06905 (version 1)
Pith IDJBQGGM23, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationLothar Moeller. "How the Moon Impacts Subsea Communication Cables." arXiv:2304.06905 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/JBQGGM23
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,836 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.61 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We report tidal-induced latency variations on a transpacific subsea cable. Week-long recordings with a precision phase meter suggest length changes in the sub-meter range caused by the Poisson effect. The described method adds to the toolbox for the new field >>optical oceanic seismology<<.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We report tidal-induced latency variations on a transpacific subsea cable. result 0.61 0.94 0.79 asserted 1.00
s1 Week-long recordings with a precision phase meter suggest length changes in the sub-meter range caused by the Poisson effect. result 0.84 0.90 0.32 hedged possibility 1.00
s2 The described method adds to the toolbox for the new field >>optical oceanic seismology<<. contribution 0.66 0.42 0.11 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.97 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We report tidal-induced latency variations on a transpacific subsea cable. Week-long recordings with a precision phase meter suggest length changes in the sub-meter range caused by the Poisson effect. The described method adds to the toolbox for the new field >>optical oceanic seismology<<.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.