REVIEW 5 cited by
Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Cross-entropy is a widely used loss function in applications. It coincides with the logistic loss applied to the outputs of a neural network, when the softmax is used. But, what guarantees can we rely on when using cross-entropy as a surrogate loss? We present a theoretical analysis of a broad family of loss functions, comp-sum losses, that includes cross-entropy (or logistic loss), generalized cross-entropy, the mean absolute error and other cross-entropy-like loss functions. We give the first $H$-consistency bounds for these loss functions. These are non-asymptotic guarantees that upper bound the zero-one loss estimation error in terms of the estimation error of a surrogate loss, for the specific hypothesis set $H$ used. We further show that our bounds are tight. These bounds depend on quantities called minimizability gaps. To make them more explicit, we give a specific analysis of these gaps for comp-sum losses. We also introduce a new family of loss functions, smooth adversarial comp-sum losses, that are derived from their comp-sum counterparts by adding in a related smooth term. We show that these loss functions are beneficial in the adversarial setting by proving that they admit $H$-consistency bounds. This leads to new adversarial robustness algorithms that consist of minimizing a regularized smooth adversarial comp-sum loss. While our main purpose is a theoretical analysis, we also present an extensive empirical analysis comparing comp-sum losses. We further report the results of a series of experiments demonstrating that our adversarial robustness algorithms outperform the current state-of-the-art, while also achieving a superior non-adversarial accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Structured Spectral Graph Representation Learning for Multi-label Abnormality Analysis from 3D CT Scans
A graph-of-slice-triplets encoder with spectral convolution outperforms 3D CNN/Transformer baselines on multi-label chest CT abnormality classification and transfers to report generation and abdominal CT.
-
FusionSort: Enhanced Cluttered Waste Segmentation with Advanced Decoding and Comprehensive Modality Optimization
FusionSort improves waste segmentation mIoU on RGB, HSI, and multispectral benchmarks with Mamba and coordinate attention, but the reported fusion advantage is internally contradicted by the paper's own tables.
-
Surg-SegFormer: A Dual Transformer-Based Model for Holistic Surgical Scene Segmentation
A dual SegFormer pipeline with confidence-based fusion achieves 0.80 mIoU on EndoVis2018 holistic segmentation but lags prompt-based models on EndoVis2017.
-
TFOC-Net: A Short-time Fourier Transform-based Deep Learning Approach for Enhancing Cross-Subject Motor Imagery Classification
Combining direct STFT input, increased STFT overlap, and balanced batching, TFOC-Net reports cross-subject motor imagery accuracies of 67.60%, 65.96%, and 80.22% on BCI Competition IV datasets IV-1, IV-2A, and IV-2B.
-
15,500 Seconds: Lean UAV Classification Using EfficientNet and Lightweight Fine-Tuning
On a private 3,100-clip, 31-class drone audio dataset, full fine-tuning of EfficientNet-B0 with three augmentations reached 95.95% validation accuracy, the best of all compared models and PEFT methods.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.