REVIEW 2 cited by
Understanding Developers Privacy Concerns Through Reddit Thread Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the growing global emphasis on regulating the protection of personal information and increasing user expectation of the same, developing with privacy in mind is becoming ever more important. In this paper, we study the concerns, questions, and solutions developers discuss on Reddit forums to enhance our understanding of their perceptions and challenges while developing applications in the current privacy-focused world. We perform various forms of Natural Language Processing (NLP) on 437,317 threads from subreddits such as r/webdev, r/androiddev, and r/iOSProgramming to identify both common points of discussion and how these points change over time as new regulations are passed around the globe. Our results show that there are common trends in privacy topics among the different subreddits while the frequency of those topics differs between web and mobile applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Good Vibrations? A Qualitative Study of Co-Creation, Communication, Flow, and Trust in Vibe Coding
A grounded theory of vibe coding: conversational co-creation with AI, flow and joy as the developer experience, and trust as the mediator between delegation and co-creation.
-
Turning to Online Forums for Legal Information: A Case Study of GDPR's Legitimate Interests
Most accepted Law Stack Exchange answers on GDPR legitimate interests are legally sound (73.4%), but gaps and imprecise terminology remain, and practitioners show systematic confusion applying this legal basis.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.