REVIEW 4 cited by
Is ChatGPT Equipped with Emotional Dialogue Capabilities?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This report presents a study on the emotional dialogue capability of ChatGPT, an advanced language model developed by OpenAI. The study evaluates the performance of ChatGPT on emotional dialogue understanding and generation through a series of experiments on several downstream tasks. Our findings indicate that while ChatGPT's performance on emotional dialogue understanding may still lag behind that of supervised models, it exhibits promising results in generating emotional responses. Furthermore, the study suggests potential avenues for future research directions.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Psychological Steering in LLMs: An Evaluation of Effectiveness and Trustworthiness
PsySET measures emotion and personality steering in LLMs across prompting, fine-tuning, and representation engineering, finding prompts most effective overall and emotion-specific safety trade-offs (e.g., joy weakens ...
-
Contrastive Distillation of Emotion Knowledge from LLMs for Zero-Shot Emotion Recognition
A BERT-sized model, trained with contrastive learning on GPT-4-generated emotion descriptors, achieves zero-shot emotion recognition across new label spaces and task types.
-
Mechanistic Interpretability of Emotion Inference in Large Language Models
Emotion inference in LLMs is localized to mid-layer attention and feed-forward units, and steering learned appraisal directions shifts generated emotions in appraisal-theory-consistent ways.
-
Multi-Party Conversational Agents: A Survey
A survey of multi-party conversational AI that organizes tasks into state-of-mind modeling, semantic understanding, and action modeling, and argues that theory of mind is the key missing ingredient.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.