Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Phase transition in Random Circuit Sampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.11119 v2 pith:KUG3GBDW submitted 2023-04-21 quant-ph

A. Morvan , B. Villalonga , X. Mi , S. Mandrà , A. Bengtsson , P. V. Klimov , Z. Chen , S. Hong
show 177 more authors
C. Erickson I. K. Drozdov J. Chau G. Laun R. Movassagh A. Asfaw L. T.A.N. Brandão R. Peralta D. Abanin R. Acharya R. Allen T. I. Andersen K. Anderson M. Ansmann F. Arute K. Arya J. Atalaya J. C. Bardin A. Bilmes G. Bortoli A. Bourassa J. Bovaird L. Brill M. Broughton B. B. Buckley D. A. Buell T. Burger B. Burkett N. Bushnell J. Campero H. S. Chang B. Chiaro D. Chik C. Chou J. Cogan R. Collins P. Conner W. Courtney A. L. Crook B. Curtin D. M. Debroy A. Del Toro Barba S. Demura A. Di Paolo A. Dunsworth L. Faoro E. Farhi R. Fatemi V. S. Ferreira L. Flores Burgos E. Forati A. G. Fowler B. Foxen G. Garcia E. Genois W. Giang C. Gidney D. Gilboa M. Giustina R. Gosula A. Grajales Dau J. A. Gross S. Habegger M. C. Hamilton M. Hansen M. P. Harrigan S. D. Harrington P. Heu M. R. Hoffmann T. Huang A. Huff W. J. Huggins L. B. Ioffe S. V. Isakov J. Iveland E. Jeffrey Z. Jiang C. Jones P. Juhas D. Kafri T. Khattar M. Khezri M. Kieferová S. Kim A. Kitaev A. R. Klots A. N. Korotkov F. Kostritsa J. M. Kreikebaum D. Landhuis P. Laptev K.-M. Lau L. Laws J. Lee K. W. Lee Y. D. Lensky B. J. Lester A. T. Lill W. Liu W. P. Livingston A. Locharla F. D. Malone O. Martin S. Martin J. R. McClean M. McEwen K. C. Miao A. Mieszala S. Montazeri W. Mruczkiewicz O. Naaman M. Neeley C. Neill A. Nersisyan M. Newman J. H. Ng A. Nguyen M. Nguyen M. Yuezhen Niu T. E. O'Brien S. Omonije A. Opremcak A. Petukhov R. Potter L. P. Pryadko C. Quintana D. M. Rhodes E. Rosenberg C. Rocque P. Roushan N. C. Rubin N. Saei D. Sank K. Sankaragomathi K. J. Satzinger H. F. Schurkus C. Schuster M. J. Shearn A. Shorter N. Shutty V. Shvarts V. Sivak J. Skruzny W. C. Smith R. D. Somma G. Sterling D. Strain M. Szalay D. Thor A. Torres G. Vidal C. Vollgraff Heidweiller T. White B. W. K. Woo C. Xing Z. J. Yao P. Yeh J. Yoo G. Young A. Zalcman Y. Zhang N. Zhu N. Zobrist E. G. Rieffel R. Biswas R. Babbush D. Bacon J. Hilton E. Lucero H. Neven A. Megrant J. Kelly I. Aleiner V. Smelyanskiy K. Kechedzhi Y. Chen S. Boixo
This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumnoisephaseprocessorstransitionalgorithmavailablebenchmarking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Undesired coupling to the surrounding environment destroys long-range correlations on quantum processors and hinders the coherent evolution in the nominally available computational space. This incoherent noise is an outstanding challenge to fully leverage the computation power of near-term quantum processors. It has been shown that benchmarking Random Circuit Sampling (RCS) with Cross-Entropy Benchmarking (XEB) can provide a reliable estimate of the effective size of the Hilbert space coherently available. The extent to which the presence of noise can trivialize the outputs of a given quantum algorithm, i.e. making it spoofable by a classical computation, is an unanswered question. Here, by implementing an RCS algorithm we demonstrate experimentally that there are two phase transitions observable with XEB, which we explain theoretically with a statistical model. The first is a dynamical transition as a function of the number of cycles and is the continuation of the anti-concentration point in the noiseless case. The second is a quantum phase transition controlled by the error per cycle; to identify it analytically and experimentally, we create a weak link model which allows varying the strength of noise versus coherent evolution. Furthermore, by presenting an RCS experiment with 67 qubits at 32 cycles, we demonstrate that the computational cost of our experiment is beyond the capabilities of existing classical supercomputers, even when accounting for the inevitable presence of noise. Our experimental and theoretical work establishes the existence of transitions to a stable computationally complex phase that is reachable with current quantum processors.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Simulation of Random Unitaries from Clebsch-Gordan Transforms

    quant-ph 2025-09 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Clebsch-Gordan transforms give exact compressed oracles for Haar-random unitary group actions, with efficient circuits for U(d).

  2. BloQBench: A Blockchain Benchmarking Framework for Quantum Supremacy

    cs.CR 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    An Ethereum contract generates hard-to-factor integer locks whose on-chain factorization is meant to certify cryptographic quantum supremacy and trigger quantum-secure signatures.

Pith tools