REVIEW 2 cited by
AdS$_3$ vacua realising $\mathfrak{osp}(n|2)$ superconformal symmetry
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We consider ${\cal N}=(n,0)$ supersymmetric AdS$_3$ vacua of type II supergravity realising the superconformal algebra $\mathfrak{osp}(n|2)$ for $n>4$. For the cases $n=6$ and $n=5$, one can realise these algebras on backgrounds that decompose as foliations of AdS$_3\times \mathbb{CP}^3$ ( squashed $\mathbb{CP}^3$ for $n=5$) over an interval. We classify such solutions with bi-spinor techniques and find the local form of each of them: They only exist in (massive) IIA and are defined locally in terms of an order 3 polynomial $h$ similar to the AdS$_7$ vacua of (massive) IIA. Many distinct local solutions exist for different tunings of $h$ that give rise to bounded (or semi infinite) intervals bounded by physical behaviour. We show that it is possible to glue these local solutions together by placing D8 branes on the interior of the interval without breaking supersymmetry, which expands the possibilities for global solutions immensely. We illustrate this point with some simple examples. Finally we also show that AdS$_3$ vacua for $n=7,8$ only exist in $d=11$ supergravity and are all locally AdS$_4\times$S$^7$.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Supersymmetric $\mathbb{WCP}^n$, AdS near horizons and orbifolds
Weighted projective spaces WCP² and WCP³ can be made supersymmetric for tuned integer weights, yielding new AdS₅×WCP²×S¹, AdS₄×WCP³, and AdS₃×WT(1,1) supergravity solutions.
-
($0,6$) AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$ and surface defects
A brane box and quiver are proposed as the 2d dual of N=(0,6) AdS3 vacua, with a central charge formula and Seiberg-like dualities, though key claims remain conjectural.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.