REVIEW 1 cited by
InfraDet3D: Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection based on Roadside Infrastructure Camera and LiDAR Sensors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Current multi-modal object detection approaches focus on the vehicle domain and are limited in the perception range and the processing capabilities. Roadside sensor units (RSUs) introduce a new domain for perception systems and leverage altitude to observe traffic. Cameras and LiDARs mounted on gantry bridges increase the perception range and produce a full digital twin of the traffic. In this work, we introduce InfraDet3D, a multi-modal 3D object detector for roadside infrastructure sensors. We fuse two LiDARs using early fusion and further incorporate detections from monocular cameras to increase the robustness and to detect small objects. Our monocular 3D detection module uses HD maps to ground object yaw hypotheses, improving the final perception results. The perception framework is deployed on a real-world intersection that is part of the A9 Test Stretch in Munich, Germany. We perform several ablation studies and experiments and show that fusing two LiDARs with two cameras leads to an improvement of +1.90 mAP compared to a camera-only solution. We evaluate our results on the A9 infrastructure dataset and achieve 68.48 mAP on the test set. The dataset and code will be available at https://a9-dataset.com to allow the research community to further improve the perception results and make autonomous driving safer.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Evaluation of an Uncertainty-Aware Late Fusion Algorithm for Multi-Source Bird's Eye View Detections Under Controlled Noise
UniKF, a Kalman-filter-based late fusion for BEV detections, achieves lower errors than IoU-based baselines on synthetic noise, but only marginal gains over the authors' own WLS method.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.