Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Multimodal Procedural Planning via Dual Text-Image Prompting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.01795 v1 pith:CDM76VI4 submitted 2023-05-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords plansmodelsmultimodalplanpromptingtext-imageabilityaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Embodied agents have achieved prominent performance in following human instructions to complete tasks. However, the potential of providing instructions informed by texts and images to assist humans in completing tasks remains underexplored. To uncover this capability, we present the multimodal procedural planning (MPP) task, in which models are given a high-level goal and generate plans of paired text-image steps, providing more complementary and informative guidance than unimodal plans. The key challenges of MPP are to ensure the informativeness, temporal coherence,and accuracy of plans across modalities. To tackle this, we propose Text-Image Prompting (TIP), a dual-modality prompting method that jointly leverages zero-shot reasoning ability in large language models (LLMs) and compelling text-to-image generation ability from diffusion-based models. TIP improves the interaction in the dual modalities using Text-to-Image Bridge and Image-to-Text Bridge, allowing LLMs to guide the textual-grounded image plan generation and leveraging the descriptions of image plans to ground the textual plan reversely. To address the lack of relevant datasets, we collect WIKIPLAN and RECIPEPLAN as a testbed for MPP. Our results show compelling human preferences and automatic scores against unimodal and multimodal baselines on WIKIPLAN and RECIPEPLAN in terms of informativeness, temporal coherence, and plan accuracy. Our code and data: https://github.com/YujieLu10/MPP.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLaPa: A Vision-Language Model Framework for Counterfactual-Aware Procedural Planning

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A VLM-based planner with task-oriented segmentation reranking and a clause-level condition retriever reports state-of-the-art scores on ActPlan-1K and ALFRED, though the reported ablation numbers are internally inconsistent.

  2. Making VLMs More Robot-Friendly: Self-Critical Distillation of Low-Level Procedural Reasoning

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A self-critique, revision, and verification loop makes small vision-language models produce more detailed and more executable robot plans, beating their own baselines and, on the paper's judge-based evaluation, plans ...

  3. Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey of LLM planning methods, benchmarks, and interpretability work, organized around a three-way taxonomy.

Pith tools