Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Large-Scale Study of Temporal Shift in Health Insurance Claims

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.05087 v2 pith:7LSXXXFE submitted 2023-05-08 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords temporalshifthealthcareshiftstasksclaimsclinicaldataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most machine learning models for predicting clinical outcomes are developed using historical data. Yet, even if these models are deployed in the near future, dataset shift over time may result in less than ideal performance. To capture this phenomenon, we consider a task--that is, an outcome to be predicted at a particular time point--to be non-stationary if a historical model is no longer optimal for predicting that outcome. We build an algorithm to test for temporal shift either at the population level or within a discovered sub-population. Then, we construct a meta-algorithm to perform a retrospective scan for temporal shift on a large collection of tasks. Our algorithms enable us to perform the first comprehensive evaluation of temporal shift in healthcare to our knowledge. We create 1,010 tasks by evaluating 242 healthcare outcomes for temporal shift from 2015 to 2020 on a health insurance claims dataset. 9.7% of the tasks show temporal shifts at the population level, and 93.0% have some sub-population affected by shifts. We dive into case studies to understand the clinical implications. Our analysis highlights the widespread prevalence of temporal shifts in healthcare.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pitfalls of Administrative Censoring in Survival Models with Time-Indexed Inputs

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    When time-indexed clinical inputs encode acquisition date and outcomes stop at a fixed cutoff, survival models can predict follow-up length instead of true event risk, inflating AUC and sometimes C-index.

Pith tools