Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CaseEncoder: A Knowledge-enhanced Pre-trained Model for Legal Case Encoding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.05393 v1 pith:QSMC3PDQ submitted 2023-05-09 cs.IR cs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.CL
keywords legalcasepre-trainingmodelscaseencoderdatageneralretrieval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Legal case retrieval is a critical process for modern legal information systems. While recent studies have utilized pre-trained language models (PLMs) based on the general domain self-supervised pre-training paradigm to build models for legal case retrieval, there are limitations in using general domain PLMs as backbones. Specifically, these models may not fully capture the underlying legal features in legal case documents. To address this issue, we propose CaseEncoder, a legal document encoder that leverages fine-grained legal knowledge in both the data sampling and pre-training phases. In the data sampling phase, we enhance the quality of the training data by utilizing fine-grained law article information to guide the selection of positive and negative examples. In the pre-training phase, we design legal-specific pre-training tasks that align with the judging criteria of relevant legal cases. Based on these tasks, we introduce an innovative loss function called Biased Circle Loss to enhance the model's ability to recognize case relevance in fine grains. Experimental results on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that CaseEncoder significantly outperforms both existing general pre-training models and legal-specific pre-training models in zero-shot legal case retrieval.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative Chinese Statute Retrieval

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A generative retriever with multi-granularity structured statute IDs and multi-task training outperforms strong sparse, dense, and legal baselines on the STARD Chinese statute benchmark.

  2. Dynamic and Parametric Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CL 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A tutorial outline that categorizes recent RAG work into Dynamic RAG and Parametric RAG, and explains why both are needed.

Pith tools