Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evaluating Embedding APIs for Information Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.06300 v2 pith:IDTQWVVX submitted 2023-05-10 cs.IR cs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.CL
keywords apisretrievalembeddingsemanticaccessbm25evaluatingexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The ever-increasing size of language models curtails their widespread availability to the community, thereby galvanizing many companies into offering access to large language models through APIs. One particular type, suitable for dense retrieval, is a semantic embedding service that builds vector representations of input text. With a growing number of publicly available APIs, our goal in this paper is to analyze existing offerings in realistic retrieval scenarios, to assist practitioners and researchers in finding suitable services according to their needs. Specifically, we investigate the capabilities of existing semantic embedding APIs on domain generalization and multilingual retrieval. For this purpose, we evaluate these services on two standard benchmarks, BEIR and MIRACL. We find that re-ranking BM25 results using the APIs is a budget-friendly approach and is most effective in English, in contrast to the standard practice of employing them as first-stage retrievers. For non-English retrieval, re-ranking still improves the results, but a hybrid model with BM25 works best, albeit at a higher cost. We hope our work lays the groundwork for evaluating semantic embedding APIs that are critical in search and more broadly, for information access.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Refining Dimensions for Improving Clustering-based Cross-lingual Topic Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An SVD-based cleaning step before clustering makes multilingual documents group by topic rather than language, improving cross-lingual topic coherence on three datasets.

  2. Finding Needles in Emb(a)dding Haystacks: Legal Document Retrieval via Bagging and SVR Ensembles

    cs.IR 2025-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    An ensemble of support vector regressors over embedding-space neighbors reaches recall 0.849 on German legal passage retrieval, higher than the reported GerDaLIR baselines.

Pith tools