Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Not All Languages Are Created Equal in LLMs: Improving Multilingual Capability by Cross-Lingual-Thought Prompting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.07004 v2 pith:I2H2OZAP submitted 2023-05-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords languagesperformancemultilingualcapabilityllmsreasoningtasksacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive multilingual capability, but their performance varies substantially across different languages. In this work, we introduce a simple yet effective method, called cross-lingual-thought prompting (XLT), to systematically improve the multilingual capability of LLMs. Specifically, XLT is a generic template prompt that stimulates cross-lingual and logical reasoning skills to enhance task performance across languages. We conduct comprehensive evaluations on 7 typical benchmarks related to reasoning, understanding, and generation tasks, covering both high-resource and low-resource languages. Experimental results show that XLT not only remarkably enhances the performance of various multilingual tasks but also significantly reduces the gap between the average performance and the best performance of each task in different languages. Notably, XLT brings over 10 points of average improvement in arithmetic reasoning and open-domain question-answering tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Language Models for Code Generation from Multilingual Prompts: A Curated Benchmark and a Study on Code Quality

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Prompt language affects LLM code generation, but English is not consistently best: Chinese prompts improve Python correctness on CoderEval, while quality and lexicon effects vary by model and programming language.

  2. The Emergence of Abstract Thought in Large Language Models Beyond Any Language

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 20 open LLMs, shared multilingual neurons grow in number and per-neuron importance over release generations, which the authors interpret as evidence of language-agnostic abstract thought and use to guide neuron...

  3. Text2Cypher Across Languages: Evaluating and Finetuning LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new multilingual Text2Cypher benchmark shows LLMs rank English highest, Spanish next, and Turkish lowest, and multilingual finetuning narrows the language gap more than English-only finetuning.

Pith tools