REVIEW 2 cited by
Measuring Surprise in the Wild
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The quantitative measurement of how and when we experience surprise has mostly remained limited to laboratory studies, and its extension to naturalistic settings has been challenging. Here we demonstrate, for the first time, how computational models of surprise rooted in cognitive science and neuroscience combined with state-of-the-art machine learned generative models can be used to detect surprising human behavior in complex, dynamic environments like road traffic. In traffic safety, such models can support the identification of traffic conflicts, modeling of road user response time, and driving behavior evaluation for both human and autonomous drivers. We also present novel approaches to quantify surprise and use naturalistic driving scenarios to demonstrate a number of advantages over existing surprise measures from the literature. Modeling surprising behavior using learned generative models is a novel concept that can be generalized beyond traffic safety to any dynamic real-world environment.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Safety Evaluation of Motion Plans Using Trajectory Predictors as Forward Reachable Set Estimators
FORCE-OPT extracts calibrated, multi-modal reachable sets from GMM trajectory predictors using convex optimization and conformal prediction, achieving the lowest balanced error rate in safety evaluation on nuScenes.
-
Automated Brake Onset Detection in Naturalistic Driving Data
A two-piece piecewise linear fit to longitudinal acceleration finds brake onset within half a second of manual annotation in 91.1% of 190 naturalistic traffic conflicts, with an R-squared based confidence metric for f...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.