Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Measuring Dimensions of Self-Presentation in Twitter Bios and their Links to Misinformation Sharing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.09548 v4 pith:ZPAGM4HN submitted 2023-05-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords biosself-presentationsharingsocialtwitterapproachesdimensionsevaluate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Social media platforms provide users with a profile description field, commonly known as a ``bio," where they can present themselves to the world. A growing literature shows that text in these bios can improve our understanding of online self-presentation and behavior, but existing work relies exclusively on keyword-based approaches to do so. We here propose and evaluate a suite of \hl{simple, effective, and theoretically motivated} approaches to embed bios in spaces that capture salient dimensions of social meaning, such as age and partisanship. We \hl{evaluate our methods on four tasks, showing that the strongest one out-performs several practical baselines.} We then show the utility of our method in helping understand associations between self-presentation and the sharing of URLs from low-quality news sites on Twitter\hl{, with a particular focus on explore the interactions between age and partisanship, and exploring the effects of self-presentations of religiosity}. Our work provides new tools to help computational social scientists make use of information in bios, and provides new insights into how misinformation sharing may be perceived on Twitter.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking Word Similarity: Semantic Similarity through Classification Confusion

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Word Confusion measures semantic similarity as classifier confusion between contextual embeddings, matching human judgments as well as or better than cosine similarity, and enables analyst-chosen feature dimensions.

Pith tools