Pith. sign in

REVIEW

LLM-based Frameworks for Power Engineering from Routine to Novel Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.11202 v3 pith:Y5AJHVNO submitted 2023-05-18 cs.HC cs.SEcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.HCcs.SEcs.SYeess.SY
keywords problemtasksframeworksknowledgellmspowerengineersframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The digitalization of energy sectors has expanded the coding responsibilities for power engineers and researchers. This research article explores the potential of leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to alleviate this burden. Here, we propose LLM-based frameworks for different programming tasks in power systems. For well-defined and routine tasks like the classic unit commitment (UC) problem, we deploy an end-to-end framework to systematically assesses four leading LLMs-ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0, Claude and Google Bard in terms of success rate, consistency, and robustness. For complex tasks with limited prior knowledge, we propose a human-in-the-loop framework to enable engineers and LLMs to collaboratively solve the problem through interactive-learning of method recommendation, problem de-composition, subtask programming and synthesis. Through a comparative study between two frameworks, we find that human-in-the-loop features like web access, problem decomposition with field knowledge and human-assisted code synthesis are essential as LLMs currently still fall short in acquiring cutting-edge and domain-specific knowledge to complete a holistic problem-solving project.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools