Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

When SAM Meets Shadow Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.11513 v1 pith:OC4266ZS submitted 2023-05-19 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords detectionshadowwhenmeetsmodelobjectperformancesegmentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As a promptable generic object segmentation model, segment anything model (SAM) has recently attracted significant attention, and also demonstrates its powerful performance. Nevertheless, it still meets its Waterloo when encountering several tasks, e.g., medical image segmentation, camouflaged object detection, etc. In this report, we try SAM on an unexplored popular task: shadow detection. Specifically, four benchmarks were chosen and evaluated with widely used metrics. The experimental results show that the performance for shadow detection using SAM is not satisfactory, especially when comparing with the elaborate models. Code is available at https://github.com/LeipingJie/SAMSh.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When SAM2 Meets Video Shadow and Mirror Detection

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Evaluating SAM2 on video shadow and mirror detection shows strong results with first-frame mask prompts and poor results with point prompts.

Pith tools