REVIEW 2 cited by
ReFIT: Relevance Feedback from a Reranker during Inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Retrieve-and-rerank is a prevalent framework in neural information retrieval, wherein a bi-encoder network initially retrieves a pre-defined number of candidates (e.g., K=100), which are then reranked by a more powerful cross-encoder model. While the reranker often yields improved candidate scores compared to the retriever, its scope is confined to only the top K retrieved candidates. As a result, the reranker cannot improve retrieval performance in terms of Recall@K. In this work, we propose to leverage the reranker to improve recall by making it provide relevance feedback to the retriever at inference time. Specifically, given a test instance during inference, we distill the reranker's predictions for that instance into the retriever's query representation using a lightweight update mechanism. The aim of the distillation loss is to align the retriever's candidate scores more closely with those produced by the reranker. The algorithm then proceeds by executing a second retrieval step using the updated query vector. We empirically demonstrate that this method, applicable to various retrieve-and-rerank frameworks, substantially enhances retrieval recall across multiple domains, languages, and modalities.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Test-Time Optimization of Query Embeddings with Ranking Aware Reward Maximization
TTT-Embed distills reranker feedback into a reusable vector added to frozen query embeddings, improving retrieval by up to 8.36 nDCG@10 and generalizing to unseen queries and tasks.
-
CoRank: LLM-Based Compact Reranking with Document Features for Scientific Retrieval
CoRank reranks scientific documents by first scoring 200 candidates from compact LLM-extracted features and then refining the top 20 with full text, improving average nDCG@10 from 50.6 to 55.5.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.