Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

How Does Generative Retrieval Scale to Millions of Passages?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.11841 v1 pith:6LBZ5FDZ submitted 2023-05-19 cs.IR cs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.CL
keywords retrievalgenerativepassagesscalingcorpusdocumentmillionsbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Popularized by the Differentiable Search Index, the emerging paradigm of generative retrieval re-frames the classic information retrieval problem into a sequence-to-sequence modeling task, forgoing external indices and encoding an entire document corpus within a single Transformer. Although many different approaches have been proposed to improve the effectiveness of generative retrieval, they have only been evaluated on document corpora on the order of 100k in size. We conduct the first empirical study of generative retrieval techniques across various corpus scales, ultimately scaling up to the entire MS MARCO passage ranking task with a corpus of 8.8M passages and evaluating model sizes up to 11B parameters. We uncover several findings about scaling generative retrieval to millions of passages; notably, the central importance of using synthetic queries as document representations during indexing, the ineffectiveness of existing proposed architecture modifications when accounting for compute cost, and the limits of naively scaling model parameters with respect to retrieval performance. While we find that generative retrieval is competitive with state-of-the-art dual encoders on small corpora, scaling to millions of passages remains an important and unsolved challenge. We believe these findings will be valuable for the community to clarify the current state of generative retrieval, highlight the unique challenges, and inspire new research directions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM-guided Hierarchical Search for End-to-end Reasoning Intensive Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM directly traverses a hierarchical semantic index of a corpus, using calibrated path-relevance scores to retrieve documents for reasoning-intensive queries.

  2. In-Context Learning as an Effective Estimator of Functional Correctness of LLM-Generated Code

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Few-shot in-context examples improve LLM-based functional correctness estimation for generated code relative to zero-shot judgment, but the gains are modest and uneven.

Pith tools