Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.13112 v2 pith:7NQKLTN5 submitted 2023-05-22 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords evaluationconversationallanguagellmsapproachavailablechatgptcrss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent success of large language models (LLMs) has shown great potential to develop more powerful conversational recommender systems (CRSs), which rely on natural language conversations to satisfy user needs. In this paper, we embark on an investigation into the utilization of ChatGPT for conversational recommendation, revealing the inadequacy of the existing evaluation protocol. It might over-emphasize the matching with the ground-truth items or utterances generated by human annotators, while neglecting the interactive nature of being a capable CRS. To overcome the limitation, we further propose an interactive Evaluation approach based on LLMs named iEvaLM that harnesses LLM-based user simulators. Our evaluation approach can simulate various interaction scenarios between users and systems. Through the experiments on two publicly available CRS datasets, we demonstrate notable improvements compared to the prevailing evaluation protocol. Furthermore, we emphasize the evaluation of explainability, and ChatGPT showcases persuasive explanation generation for its recommendations. Our study contributes to a deeper comprehension of the untapped potential of LLMs for CRSs and provides a more flexible and easy-to-use evaluation framework for future research endeavors. The codes and data are publicly available at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/iEvaLM-CRS.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. User Simulator-Guided Multi-Turn Preference Optimization for Reasoning LLM-based Conversational Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    SMTPO uses multi-task SFT to improve simulator feedback quality and RL with fine-grained rewards to optimize multi-turn preference reasoning in LLM-based conversational recommendation.

  2. Evaluating Recabilities of Foundation Models: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Dataset Benchmark

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A large-scale benchmark finds that in-domain fine-tuning works best for foundation model recommenders, while cross-dataset and multi-domain training help in new scenarios.

  3. VRAgent-R1: Boosting Video Recommendation with MLLM-based Agents via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.MM 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VRAgent-R1 uses an MLLM agent to summarize videos and a reinforcement-learned agent to simulate user choices, improving video recommendation and user-decision simulation on MicroLens-100K.

  4. Towards Fast Domain Adaptation and Fine-Grained User Simulation for Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    AdaptSim is an adaptive user simulator for CRS evaluation that combines automatic prompt generation, open actions, controlled text generation, and BFS-based pairwise comparison to produce realistic dialogues and asses...

  5. A Language-Driven Framework for Improving Personalized Recommendations: Merging LLMs with Traditional Algorithms

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM-based re-ranking layer over SVD/SVD++ improves offline rating and ranking metrics on MovieLens-Latest-Small, but evaluation and baseline gaps limit the strength of the claim.

Pith tools