Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Weighted Context-Free-Language Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.13610 v2 pith:CQPCW4YC submitted 2023-05-23 cs.FL quant-ph

classification cs.FLquant-ph
keywords wcflobddswbddsweightedbddsbettercflobddscontext-free-languagedecision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

This paper presents a new data structure, called \emph{Weighted Context-Free-Language Ordered BDDs} (WCFLOBDDs), which are a hierarchically structured decision diagram, akin to Weighted BDDs (WBDDs) enhanced with a procedure-call mechanism. For some functions, WCFLOBDDs are exponentially more succinct than WBDDs. They are potentially beneficial for representing functions of type $\mathbb{B}^n \rightarrow D$, when a function's image $V \subseteq D$ has many different values. We apply WCFLOBDDs in quantum-circuit simulation, and find that they perform better than WBDDs on certain benchmarks. With a 15-minute timeout, the number of qubits that can be handled by WCFLOBDDs is 1-64$\times$ that of WBDDs (and 1-128$\times$ that of CFLOBDDs, which are an unweighted version of WCFLOBDDs). These results support the conclusion that for this application -- from the standpoint of problem size, measured as the number of qubits -- WCFLOBDDs provide the best of both worlds: performance roughly matches whichever of WBDDs and CFLOBDDs is better. (From the standpoint of running time, the results are more nuanced.)

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools