REVIEW 2 cited by
Patch-Mix Contrastive Learning with Audio Spectrogram Transformer on Respiratory Sound Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Respiratory sound contains crucial information for the early diagnosis of fatal lung diseases. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a growing interest in contact-free medical care based on electronic stethoscopes. To this end, cutting-edge deep learning models have been developed to diagnose lung diseases; however, it is still challenging due to the scarcity of medical data. In this study, we demonstrate that the pretrained model on large-scale visual and audio datasets can be generalized to the respiratory sound classification task. In addition, we introduce a straightforward Patch-Mix augmentation, which randomly mixes patches between different samples, with Audio Spectrogram Transformer (AST). We further propose a novel and effective Patch-Mix Contrastive Learning to distinguish the mixed representations in the latent space. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ICBHI dataset, outperforming the prior leading score by an improvement of 4.08%.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Patient Domain Supervised Contrastive Learning for Lung Sound Classification Using Mobile Phone
Patient Domain Supervised Contrastive Learning (PD-SCL) improves lung sound classification on mobile-phone recordings by 2.4 points over an AST baseline, but the result relies on a small private dataset with no error bars.
-
Adaptive Differential Denoising for Respiratory Sounds Classification
An Adaptive Differential Denoising network achieves a 65.53% average score on ICBHI 2017 respiratory sound classification, surpassing the previous best by 1.99%.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.