Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

LLM-powered Data Augmentation for Enhanced Cross-lingual Performance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14288 v2 pith:BCEEH353 submitted 2023-05-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords datalanguagesllmschatgptgeneratedgpt-4augmentationdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper explores the potential of leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for data augmentation in multilingual commonsense reasoning datasets where the available training data is extremely limited. To achieve this, we utilise several LLMs, namely Dolly-v2, StableVicuna, ChatGPT, and GPT-4, to augment three datasets: XCOPA, XWinograd, and XStoryCloze. Subsequently, we evaluate the effectiveness of fine-tuning smaller multilingual models, mBERT and XLMR, using the synthesised data. We compare the performance of training with data generated in English and target languages, as well as translated English-generated data, revealing the overall advantages of incorporating data generated by LLMs, e.g. a notable 13.4 accuracy score improvement for the best case. Furthermore, we conduct a human evaluation by asking native speakers to assess the naturalness and logical coherence of the generated examples across different languages. The results of the evaluation indicate that LLMs such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 excel at producing natural and coherent text in most languages, however, they struggle to generate meaningful text in certain languages like Tamil. We also observe that ChatGPT falls short in generating plausible alternatives compared to the original dataset, whereas examples from GPT-4 exhibit competitive logical consistency.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. StaAgent: An Agentic Framework for Testing Static Analyzers

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-powered four-agent framework performs metamorphic testing on static analyzers and reports 64 faulty rule implementations across SpotBugs, SonarQube, ErrorProne, Infer, and PMD.

  2. Iterative Augmentation with Summarization Refinement (IASR) Evaluation for Unstructured Survey data Modeling and Analysis

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper evaluates four LLMs as text augmenters and reports GPT-3.5 Turbo as the best, and that combining augmentation with GPT topic labels increases BERTopic's discovered topics from 5 to 20 with zero overlap.

  3. Foundation Model Empowered Synesthesia of Machines (SoM): AI-native Intelligent Multi-Modal Sensing-Communication Integration

    eess.SP 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a systematic classification and two roadmaps for using foundation models (LLMs and wireless foundation models) to design Synesthesia of Machines systems for 6G, with preliminary case-study evidence ...

  4. Enhancing Technical Documents Retrieval for RAG

    cs.IR 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A dual-encoder retrieval model fine-tuned with LLM-generated queries, contextual summaries, and prompt tuning shows small improvements over standard embedding baselines on RAG-EDA and Rust-Docs-QA.

Pith tools