Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Mixture-of-Experts Meets Instruction Tuning:A Winning Combination for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14705 v2 pith:M56GCB7R submitted 2023-05-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsinstructiontuningtasksdownstreamfinetuninglanguagedense
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) is a neural architecture design that can be utilized to add learnable parameters to Large Language Models (LLMs) without increasing inference cost. Instruction tuning is a technique for training LLMs to follow instructions. We advocate combining these two approaches, as we find that MoE models benefit more from instruction tuning than dense models. In particular, we conduct empirical studies across three experimental setups: (i) Direct finetuning on individual downstream tasks devoid of instruction tuning; (ii) Instructiontuning followed by in-context few-shot or zero-shot generalization on downstream tasks; and (iii) Instruction tuning supplemented by further finetuning on individual downstream tasks. In the first scenario, MoE models overall underperform dense models of identical computational capacity. This narrative, however, dramatically changes with the introduction of instruction tuning (second and third scenario), used independently or in conjunction with task-specific finetuning. Our most powerful model, FLAN-MOE-32B, surpasses the performance of FLAN-PALM-62B on four benchmark tasks, while using only a third of the FLOPs. The advancements embodied byFLAN-MOE inspire a reevaluation of the design principles of large-scale, high-performance language models in the framework of task-agnostic learning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GeMoE: Gating Entropy is All You Need for Uncertainty-aware Adaptive Routing in MoE-based Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    GeMoE adaptively sets the number of experts per token via gating entropy, retaining 99.5% of static-routing performance while raising average sparsity by 36.5%.

  2. InfiniLoRA: Disaggregated Multi-LoRA Serving for Large Language Models

    cs.DC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    InfiniLoRA decouples LoRA execution from base-model inference and reports 3.05x higher request throughput plus 54% more adapters meeting strict latency SLOs.

  3. AlignCultura: Towards Culturally Aligned Large Language Models?

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Align-Cultura introduces the CULTURAX dataset and shows that culturally fine-tuned LLMs improve joint HHH scores by 4-6%, cut cultural failures by 18%, and gain 10-12% efficiency with minimal leakage.

  4. DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    DeepSeekMoE 2B matches GShard 2.9B performance and approaches a dense 2B model; the 16B version matches LLaMA2-7B at 40% compute by using fine-grained expert segmentation plus shared experts.

  5. A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2023-06 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    This survey organizes the architectures, training strategies, data, evaluation methods, extensions, and challenges of Multimodal Large Language Models.

Pith tools