Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Advancements in Arabic Grammatical Error Detection and Correction: An Empirical Investigation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14734 v2 pith:N7WRDUCC submitted 2023-05-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords arabicmodelsdatasetserrorgrammaticalresultscorrectiondata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Grammatical error correction (GEC) is a well-explored problem in English with many existing models and datasets. However, research on GEC in morphologically rich languages has been limited due to challenges such as data scarcity and language complexity. In this paper, we present the first results on Arabic GEC using two newly developed Transformer-based pretrained sequence-to-sequence models. We also define the task of multi-class Arabic grammatical error detection (GED) and present the first results on multi-class Arabic GED. We show that using GED information as an auxiliary input in GEC models improves GEC performance across three datasets spanning different genres. Moreover, we also investigate the use of contextual morphological preprocessing in aiding GEC systems. Our models achieve SOTA results on two Arabic GEC shared task datasets and establish a strong benchmark on a recently created dataset. We make our code, data, and pretrained models publicly available.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Grammatical Error Detection using BERT with Cleaned Lang-8 Dataset

    cs.CL 2024-11 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning BERT-base-uncased on a hand-cleaned Lang-8 subset yields F1 0.91 on that same distribution, but the result is not benchmarked against standard GED tests.

Pith tools