REVIEW 1 cited by
Improved Complexity Analysis of the Sinkhorn and Greenkhorn Algorithms for Optimal Transport
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The Sinkhorn algorithm is a widely used method for solving the optimal transport problem, and the Greenkhorn algorithm is one of its variants. While there are modified versions of these two algorithms whose computational complexities are $O({n^2\|C\|_\infty^2\log n}/{\varepsilon^2})$ to achieve an $\varepsilon$-accuracy, to the best of our knowledge, the existing complexities for the vanilla versions are $O({n^2\|C\|_\infty^3\log n}/{\varepsilon^3})$. In this paper we fill this gap and show that the complexities of the vanilla Sinkhorn and Greenkhorn algorithms are indeed $O({n^2\|C\|_\infty^2\log n}/{\varepsilon^2})$. The analysis relies on the equicontinuity of the dual variables for the discrete entropic regularized optimal transport problem, which is of independent interest.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bias as a Virtue: Rethinking Generalization under Distribution Shifts
A toy model and two datasets suggest higher in-distribution bias can reduce out-of-distribution error, yielding the ADB training-order selection method.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.