Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improved Complexity Analysis of the Sinkhorn and Greenkhorn Algorithms for Optimal Transport

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14939 v2 pith:ZVMPXQL3 submitted 2023-05-24 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords varepsilonalgorithmscomplexitiesgreenkhorninftyoptimalsinkhorntransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The Sinkhorn algorithm is a widely used method for solving the optimal transport problem, and the Greenkhorn algorithm is one of its variants. While there are modified versions of these two algorithms whose computational complexities are $O({n^2\|C\|_\infty^2\log n}/{\varepsilon^2})$ to achieve an $\varepsilon$-accuracy, to the best of our knowledge, the existing complexities for the vanilla versions are $O({n^2\|C\|_\infty^3\log n}/{\varepsilon^3})$. In this paper we fill this gap and show that the complexities of the vanilla Sinkhorn and Greenkhorn algorithms are indeed $O({n^2\|C\|_\infty^2\log n}/{\varepsilon^2})$. The analysis relies on the equicontinuity of the dual variables for the discrete entropic regularized optimal transport problem, which is of independent interest.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bias as a Virtue: Rethinking Generalization under Distribution Shifts

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A toy model and two datasets suggest higher in-distribution bias can reduce out-of-distribution error, yielding the ADB training-order selection method.

Pith tools