REVIEW 5 cited by
Time to Bribe: Measuring Block Construction Market
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the emergence of Miner Extractable Value (MEV), block construction markets on blockchains have evolved into a competitive arena. Following Ethereum's transition from Proof of Work (PoW) to Proof of Stake (PoS), the Proposer Builder Separation (PBS) mechanism has emerged as the dominant force in the Ethereum block construction market. This paper presents an in-depth longitudinal study of the Ethereum block construction market, spanning from the introduction of PoS and PBS in September 2022 to May 2023. We analyze the market shares of builders and relays, their temporal changes, and the financial dynamics within the PBS system, including payments among builders and block proposers -- commonly referred to as bribes. We introduce an MEV-time law quantifying the expected MEV revenue wrt. the time elapsed since the last proposed block. We provide empirical evidence that moments of crisis (e.g. the FTX collapse, USDC stablecoin de-peg) coincide with significant spikes in MEV payments compared to the baseline. Despite the intention of the PBS architecture to enhance decentralization by separating actor roles, it remains unclear whether its design is optimal. Implicit trust assumptions and conflicts of interest may benefit particular parties and foster the need for vertical integration. MEV-Boost was explicitly designed to foster decentralization, causing the side effect of enabling risk-free sandwich extraction from unsuspecting users, potentially raising concerns for regulators.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Collusion with Competitive Marginals: Price-Level Audits Are Blind by Construction
Bidding agents coupled only through hidden shared randomness transfer seller rent while leaving every individual bid distribution unchanged, making single-agent price-level audits provably powerless.
-
Accountable Transaction Inclusion Lists: Enhancing Ethereum's Censorship Resistance
FairFIL makes multi-block censorship costly by requiring builders to disclose excluded transactions and forcing the next block to include them, with loss of the whole block reward for omissions.
-
Blockspace Under Pressure: An Analysis of Spam MEV on High-Throughput Blockchains
Equilibrium spam-MEV volume on high-throughput chains is derived in closed form as a function of block capacity, minimum gas price, and fee ordering, and is tested on Base and Arbitrum data.
-
Measuring CEX-DEX Extracted Value and Searcher Profitability: The Darkest of the MEV Dark Forest
CEX-DEX arbitrage on Ethereum extracted an estimated 233.8M USD in 19 months, increasingly concentrated among three searchers tied to dominant block builders.
-
Why Ethereum Needs Fairness Mechanisms that Do Not Depend on Participants' Altruism
At most ~1.4% of Ethereum proposers show no evidence of profit-seeking behavior — cutting the commonly cited 9% altruistic share — so altruism-based fairness committees would need ≥128 members to be effective.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.