Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Examination of outer-layer similarity in wall turbulence over obstructed surfaces

Fluid Dynamics · Submitted 26 May 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our results suggest a modified outer-layer similarity, where the K\'arm\'an constant, $\kappa$, is not 0.39, but turbulence is otherwise smooth-wall-like.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2305.16764 (version 2)
Pith IDLRVVDJM3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationRicardo Garc\'ia-Mayoral, Zishen Chen. "Examination of outer-layer similarity in wall turbulence over obstructed surfaces." arXiv:2305.16764 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/LRVVDJM3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,846 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.48 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.62 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Turbulent flows over canopies of rigid filaments with different densities, $\lambda_f$, are studied using direct simulations at Reynolds numbers $Re_\tau\approx550-1000$. The canopies have heights $h^+\approx110-220$, and are an instance of obstructing substrate. We show that conventional methods used to determine the zero-plane displacement can be at odds with proper outer-layer similarity and may not be applicable for flows at moderate $Re_\tau$. Instead, we determine $\Delta y$ and the length and velocity scales that recover outer-layer similarity by minimising the difference between the smooth-wall and canopy diagnostic function everywhere above the roughness sublayer, not just in the logarithmic layer. We also investigate if the zero-plane displacement and the friction velocity can be set independently, but find that outer-layer similarity is more consistently recovered when they are coupled. Our results suggest a modified outer-layer similarity, where the K\'arm\'an constant, $\kappa$, is not 0.39, but turbulence is otherwise smooth-wall-like. When the canopy is dense, the flow above the tips is essentially smooth-wall-like, with smooth-wall-like $\kappa\approx0.39$ and origin essentially at the tip plane. For intermediate densities, the overlying flow perceives a deeper zero-plane displacement, in agreement with previous studies, but exhibits a lower K\'arm\'an constant, $\kappa\approx0.34-0.36$. For sparse canopies, $\kappa$ tends back to its smooth-wall value, and the zero-plane-displacement height is at the canopy bed. For all canopies studied, the decrease in $\kappa$ never exceeds 15%, which is significantly less than that obtained in some previous works using conventional methods to assess outer-layer similarity.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Turbulent flows over canopies of rigid filaments with different densities, $\lambda_f$, are studied using direct simulations at Reynolds numbers $Re_\tau\approx550-1000$. method 0.62 0.94 0.02 asserted 0.94
s1 The canopies have heights $h^+\approx110-220$, and are an instance of obstructing substrate. method 0.65 0.65 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 We show that conventional methods used to determine the zero-plane displacement can be at odds with proper outer-layer similarity and may not be applicable for flows at moderate $Re_\tau$. result 0.55 0.58 0.22 hedged possibility 0.60
s3 Instead, we determine $\Delta y$ and the length and velocity scales that recover outer-layer similarity by minimising the difference between the smooth-wall and canopy diagnostic function everywhere above the roughness sublayer, not just in the logarithmic layer. method 0.98 0.97 0.14 asserted 1.00
s4 We also investigate if the zero-plane displacement and the friction velocity can be set independently, but find that outer-layer similarity is more consistently recovered when they are coupled. result 0.88 0.97 0.09 asserted 0.99
s5 Our results suggest a modified outer-layer similarity, where the K\'arm\'an constant, $\kappa$, is not 0.39, but turbulence is otherwise smooth-wall-like. interpretation 0.57 0.90 0.62 hedged possibility 0.99
s6 When the canopy is dense, the flow above the tips is essentially smooth-wall-like, with smooth-wall-like $\kappa\approx0.39$ and origin essentially at the tip plane. result 0.99 0.91 0.12 asserted 1.00
s7 For intermediate densities, the overlying flow perceives a deeper zero-plane displacement, in agreement with previous studies, but exhibits a lower K\'arm\'an constant, $\kappa\approx0.34-0.36$. result 1.00 0.84 0.14 asserted 0.97
s8 For sparse canopies, $\kappa$ tends back to its smooth-wall value, and the zero-plane-displacement height is at the canopy bed. result 1.00 0.89 0.09 asserted 0.54
s9 For all canopies studied, the decrease in $\kappa$ never exceeds 15%, which is significantly less than that obtained in some previous works using conventional methods to assess outer-layer similarity. result 0.96 0.88 0.21 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Turbulent flows over canopies of rigid filaments with different densities, $\lambda_f$, are studied using direct simulations at Reynolds numbers $Re_\tau\approx550-1000$. The canopies have heights $h^+\approx110-220$, and are an instance of obstructing substrate. We show that conventional methods used to determine the zero-plane displacement can be at odds with proper outer-layer similarity and may not be applicable for flows at moderate $Re_\tau$. Instead, we determine $\Delta y$ and the length and velocity scales that recover outer-layer similarity by minimising the difference between the smooth-wall and canopy diagnostic function everywhere above the roughness sublayer, not just in the logarithmic layer. We also investigate if the zero-plane displacement and the friction velocity can be set independently, but find that outer-layer similarity is more consistently recovered when they are coupled. Our results suggest a modified outer-layer similarity, where the K\'arm\'an constant, $\kappa$, is not 0.39, but turbulence is otherwise smooth-wall-like. When the canopy is dense, the flow above the tips is essentially smooth-wall-like, with smooth-wall-like $\kappa\approx0.39$ and origin essentially at the tip plane. For intermediate densities, the overlying flow perceives a deeper zero-plane displacement, in agreement with previous studies, but exhibits a lower K\'arm\'an constant, $\kappa\approx0.34-0.36$. For sparse canopies, $\kappa$ tends back to its smooth-wall value, and the zero-plane-displacement height is at the canopy bed. For all canopies studied, the decrease in $\kappa$ never exceeds 15%, which is significantly less than that obtained in some previous works using conventional methods to assess outer-layer similarity.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.