Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bond formation at polycarbonate | X interfaces (X = Al$_2$O$_3$, TiO$_2$, TiAlO$_2$) studied by theory and experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.17430 v1 pith:JKD2GVLH submitted 2023-05-27 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords bondinterfacesbondstialoformationinterfaceinterfacialmetal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Interfacial bond formation during sputter deposition of metal oxide thin films onto polycarbonate (PC) is investigated by ab initio molecular dynamics simulations and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of PC | X interfaces (X = Al$_2$O$_3$, TiO$_2$, TiAlO$_2$). Generally, the predicted bond formation is consistent with the experimental data. For all three interfaces, the majority of bonds identified by XPS are (C-O)-metal bonds, whereas C-metal bonds are the minority. Compared to the PC | Al$_2$O$_3$ interface, the PC | TiO$_2$ and PC | TiAlO$_2$ interfaces exhibit a reduction in the measured interfacial bond density by ~ 75 and ~ 65%, respectively. Multiplying the predicted bond strength with the corresponding experimentally determined interfacial bond density shows that Al$_2$O$_3$ exhibits the strongest interface with PC, while TiO$_2$ and TiAlO$_2$ exhibit ~ 70 and ~ 60% weaker interfaces, respectively. This can be understood by considering the complex interplay between the metal oxide composition, the bond strength as well as the population of bonds that are formed across the interface.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools