REVIEW 2 cited by
Model averaging approaches to data subset selection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Model averaging approaches to data subset selection
read the original abstract
Model averaging is a useful and robust method for dealing with model uncertainty in statistical analysis. Often, it is useful to consider data subset selection at the same time, in which model selection criteria are used to compare models across different subsets of the data. Two different criteria have been proposed in the literature for how the data subsets should be weighted. We compare the two criteria closely in a unified treatment based on the Kullback-Leibler divergence, and conclude that one of them is subtly flawed and will tend to yield larger uncertainties due to loss of information. Analytical and numerical examples are provided.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Third moments of nucleon unpolarized, polarized, and transversity parton distribution functions from physical-point lattice QCD
First lattice QCD calculation at the physical pion mass of the isovector third moments of nucleon unpolarized, polarized, and transversity PDFs via forward matrix elements of local operators.
-
$f_K/f_{\pi}$ in iso-symmetric QCD and the CKM matrix unitarity
Lattice QCD result for f_K/f_π in isoQCD gives |V_us|/|V_ud| consistent with CKM unitarity once isospin and QED effects are included.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.