REVIEW 2 cited by
Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective Flows
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Normalizing Flows explicitly maximize a full-dimensional likelihood on the training data. However, real data is typically only supported on a lower-dimensional manifold leading the model to expend significant compute on modeling noise. Injective Flows fix this by jointly learning a manifold and the distribution on it. So far, they have been limited by restrictive architectures and/or high computational cost. We lift both constraints by a new efficient estimator for the maximum likelihood loss, compatible with free-form bottleneck architectures. We further show that naively learning both the data manifold and the distribution on it can lead to divergent solutions, and use this insight to motivate a stable maximum likelihood training objective. We perform extensive experiments on toy, tabular and image data, demonstrating the competitive performance of the resulting model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Understanding Self-Supervised Learning via Latent Distribution Matching
Self-supervised learning is recast as latent distribution matching that unifies multiple SSL families and yields a sampling-free Kalman-based predictor plus an identifiability proof for predictive variants under mild ...
-
Super-Resolving Normalising Flows for Lattice Field Theories
An RG-inspired normalising flow with exact likelihood tracking samples 2D phi^4 theory on 128x128 lattices using only 4x4 MCMC samples, keeping high ESS/N in symmetric and broken phases.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.