Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Automatic Assessment of Oral Reading Accuracy for Reading Diagnostics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.03444 v1 pith:MLUNTPJQ submitted 2023-06-06 cs.CL cs.SDeess.ASeess.SP

classification cs.CLcs.SDeess.ASeess.SP
keywords readingassessmentautomaticsystemaccuracyoralreachedsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic assessment of reading fluency using automatic speech recognition (ASR) holds great potential for early detection of reading difficulties and subsequent timely intervention. Precise assessment tools are required, especially for languages other than English. In this study, we evaluate six state-of-the-art ASR-based systems for automatically assessing Dutch oral reading accuracy using Kaldi and Whisper. Results show our most successful system reached substantial agreement with human evaluations (MCC = .63). The same system reached the highest correlation between forced decoding confidence scores and word correctness (r = .45). This system's language model (LM) consisted of manual orthographic transcriptions and reading prompts of the test data, which shows that including reading errors in the LM improves assessment performance. We discuss the implications for developing automatic assessment systems and identify possible avenues of future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools