Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Challenges and Perspectives of Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.05705 v2 pith:V4HEJBEV submitted 2023-06-09 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords modelsmedicalfoundationanalysisapplicationschallengesdatadownstream
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This article discusses the opportunities, applications and future directions of large-scale pre-trained models, i.e., foundation models, for analyzing medical images. Medical foundation models have immense potential in solving a wide range of downstream tasks, as they can help to accelerate the development of accurate and robust models, reduce the large amounts of required labeled data, preserve the privacy and confidentiality of patient data. Specifically, we illustrate the "spectrum" of medical foundation models, ranging from general vision models, modality-specific models, to organ/task-specific models, highlighting their challenges, opportunities and applications. We also discuss how foundation models can be leveraged in downstream medical tasks to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of medical image analysis, leading to more precise diagnosis and treatment decisions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Open Foundation Models in Healthcare: Challenges, Paradoxes, and Opportunities with GenAI Driven Personalized Prescription

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Open LLMs (LLaMA-2, LLaMA-3, Mistral, Meditron) roughly match GPT-4 on a 25-patient prescription-suitability check when given SmPC context via RAG, though some interaction classes degrade with RAG.

Pith tools