Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An Empirical Study of Bugs in Quantum Machine Learning Frameworks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.06369 v3 pith:VHSWQOWG submitted 2023-06-10 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords bugsframeworkframeworkslearningmachineplatformsquantumcritical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum computing has emerged as a promising domain for the machine learning (ML) area, offering significant computational advantages over classical counterparts. With the growing interest in quantum machine learning (QML), ensuring the correctness and robustness of software platforms to develop such QML programs is critical. A necessary step for ensuring the reliability of such platforms is to understand the bugs they typically suffer from. To address this need, this paper presents the first comprehensive study of bugs in QML frameworks. We inspect 391 real-world bugs collected from 22 open-source repositories of nine popular QML frameworks. We find that 1) 28% of the bugs are quantum-specific, such as erroneous unitary matrix implementation, calling for dedicated approaches to find and prevent them; 2) We manually distilled a taxonomy of five symptoms and nine root cause of bugs in QML platforms; 3) We summarized four critical challenges for QML framework developers. The study results provide researchers with insights into how to ensure QML framework quality and present several actionable suggestions for QML framework developers to improve their code quality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bridging the Quantum Divide: Aligning Academic and Industry Goals in Software Engineering

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Academic quantum software research overemphasizes quantum-only bugs and underdelivers on the integration and compatibility issues that industry developers actually face.

Pith tools