Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The BEA 2023 Shared Task on Generating AI Teacher Responses in Educational Dialogues

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.06941 v1 pith:OMHZ7C3I submitted 2023-06-12 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords responseseducationaltaskabilitycontextsdialoguedialoguesevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper describes the results of the first shared task on the generation of teacher responses in educational dialogues. The goal of the task was to benchmark the ability of generative language models to act as AI teachers, replying to a student in a teacher-student dialogue. Eight teams participated in the competition hosted on CodaLab. They experimented with a wide variety of state-of-the-art models, including Alpaca, Bloom, DialoGPT, DistilGPT-2, Flan-T5, GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT- 4, LLaMA, OPT-2.7B, and T5-base. Their submissions were automatically scored using BERTScore and DialogRPT metrics, and the top three among them were further manually evaluated in terms of pedagogical ability based on Tack and Piech (2022). The NAISTeacher system, which ranked first in both automated and human evaluation, generated responses with GPT-3.5 using an ensemble of prompts and a DialogRPT-based ranking of responses for given dialogue contexts. Despite the promising achievements of the participating teams, the results also highlight the need for evaluation metrics better suited to educational contexts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Findings of the BEA 2025 Shared Task on Pedagogical Ability Assessment of AI-powered Tutors

    cs.CY 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Best submitted systems scored 58-72 macro F1 on four three-class pedagogical assessment tracks and 97 macro F1 on nine-class tutor identification, showing automatic evaluation of AI math tutors works but still has roo...

Pith tools