Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Learning Spanning Forests Optimally using CUT Queries in Weighted Undirected Graphs

Data Structures and Algorithms · Submitted 16 Jun 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this paper we describe a randomized algorithm which returns a maximal spanning forest of an unknown {\em weighted} undirected graph making $O(n)$ $\mathsf{CUT}$ queries in expectation.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2306.10182 (version 1)
Pith IDQPFKU3GC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDeeparnab Chakrabarty, Hang Liao. "Learning Spanning Forests Optimally using CUT Queries in Weighted Undirected Graphs." arXiv:2306.10182 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/QPFKU3GC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,821 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.10 · states limitation 0.32 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.06 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.95 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this paper we describe a randomized algorithm which returns a maximal spanning forest of an unknown {\em weighted} undirected graph making $O(n)$ $\mathsf{CUT}$ queries in expectation. For weighted graphs, this is optimal due to a result in [Auza and Lee, 2021] which shows an $\Omega(n)$ lower bound for zero-error randomized algorithms. %To our knowledge, it is the only regime of this problem where we have upper and lower bounds tight up to constants. These questions have been extensively studied in the past few years, especially due to the problem's connections to symmetric submodular function minimization. We also describe a simple polynomial time deterministic algorithm that makes $O(\frac{n\log n}{\log\log n})$ queries on undirected unweighted graphs and returns a maximal spanning forest, thereby (slightly) improving upon the state-of-the-art.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this paper we describe a randomized algorithm which returns a maximal spanning forest of an unknown {\em weighted} undirected graph making $O(n)$ $\mathsf{CUT}$ queries in expectation. contribution 0.93 0.95 0.83 asserted 1.00
s1 For weighted graphs, this is optimal due to a result in [Auza and Lee, 2021] which shows an $\Omega(n)$ lower bound for zero-error randomized algorithms. %To our knowledge, it is the only regime of this problem where we have upper and lower bounds tight up to constants. interpretation 0.85 0.13 0.34 asserted 1.00
s2 These questions have been extensively studied in the past few years, especially due to the problem's connections to symmetric submodular function minimization. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 We also describe a simple polynomial time deterministic algorithm that makes $O(\frac{n\log n}{\log\log n})$ queries on undirected unweighted graphs and returns a maximal spanning forest, thereby (slightly) improving upon the state-of-the-art. contribution 0.93 0.96 0.11 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.96 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this paper we describe a randomized algorithm which returns a maximal spanning forest of an unknown {\em weighted} undirected graph making $O(n)$ $\mathsf{CUT}$ queries in expectation. For weighted graphs, this is optimal due to a result in [Auza and Lee, 2021] which shows an $\Omega(n)$ lower bound for zero-error randomized algorithms. %To our knowledge, it is the only regime of this problem where we have upper and lower bounds tight up to constants. These questions have been extensively studied in the past few years, especially due to the problem's connections to symmetric submodular function minimization. We also describe a simple polynomial time deterministic algorithm that makes $O(\frac{n\log n}{\log\log n})$ queries on undirected unweighted graphs and returns a maximal spanning forest, thereby (slightly) improving upon the state-of-the-art.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper
  • This particular question of connectivity has seen a lot of interest in the recent years (cf. [ref] ) mainly due to the connections to streaming and sketching, but also due to connections to submodular function minimization (SFM).

    On the query complexity of connectivity with global queries · Introduction · 0.96

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.