Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Annotating Ambiguous Images: General Annotation Strategy for High-Quality Data with Real-World Biomedical Validation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.12189 v2 pith:S5V2MZ4F submitted 2023-06-21 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords real-worldambiguousbiomedicaldatafieldhigh-qualitylabelsstrategies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the field of image classification, existing methods often struggle with biased or ambiguous data, a prevalent issue in real-world scenarios. Current strategies, including semi-supervised learning and class blending, offer partial solutions but lack a definitive resolution. Addressing this gap, our paper introduces a novel strategy for generating high-quality labels in challenging datasets. Central to our approach is a clearly designed flowchart, based on a broad literature review, which enables the creation of reliable labels. We validate our methodology through a rigorous real-world test case in the biomedical field, specifically in deducing height reduction from vertebral imaging. Our empirical study, leveraging over 250,000 annotations, demonstrates the effectiveness of our strategies decisions compared to their alternatives.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Probabilistic Segment Anything Model for Ambiguity-Aware Medical Image Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A SAM variant that samples a latent code into the prompt embedding produces diverse lung nodule masks and reports better GED, DSC, and IoU than Probabilistic U-Net on LIDC-IDRI.

Pith tools