Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Selective inference using randomized group lasso estimators for general models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.13829 v3 pith:4GE4NDD6 submitted 2023-06-24 stat.ME math.STstat.MLstat.TH

classification stat.MEmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords selectiveinferencelassocovariatesgroupgroupedallowsdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Selective inference methods are developed for group lasso estimators for use with a wide class of distributions and loss functions. The method includes the use of exponential family distributions, as well as quasi-likelihood modeling for overdispersed count data, for example, and allows for categorical or grouped covariates as well as continuous covariates. A randomized group-regularized optimization problem is studied. The added randomization allows us to construct a post-selection likelihood which we show to be adequate for selective inference when conditioning on the event of the selection of the grouped covariates. This likelihood also provides a selective point estimator, accounting for the selection by the group lasso. Confidence regions for the regression parameters in the selected model take the form of Wald-type regions and are shown to have bounded volume. The selective inference method for grouped lasso is illustrated on data from the national health and nutrition examination survey while simulations showcase its behaviour and favorable comparison with other methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Flexible Selective Inference with Flow-based Transport Maps

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A normalizing flow learns the post-selection conditional distribution through simulated selection events, then transforms inference back to the pre-selection distribution to correct selection bias.

  2. Reluctant Interaction Inference after Additive Modeling

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A selective inference method produces valid p-values for interaction effects after a sparse additive model is fit to the same data, using external randomization and full-data statistics.

Pith tools