Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Galaxy Quenching with Mass Growth History of Galaxy Groups and Clusters: The Importance of Post-Processing

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
So-Myoung Park, Kyungwon Chun, Jihye Shin, Hyunjin Jeong, Joon Hyeop Lee, Mina Pak, Rory Smith, Jae-Woo Kim

Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 11 Jul 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Simulations show that most satellites are quenched after they fall into their final hosts: post-processing is a more dominant mechanism of galaxy quenching than pre-processing.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2307.05682 (version 1)
Pith IDHRGRDZWD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHyunjin Jeong, Jae-Woo Kim, Jihye Shin, Joon Hyeop Lee, Kyungwon Chun, Mina Pak, Rory Smith, So-Myoung Park. "Galaxy Quenching with Mass Growth History of Galaxy Groups and Clusters: The Importance of Post-Processing." arXiv:2307.05682 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/HRGRDZWD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,422 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.14 · compares with prior results 0.19 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We investigate the fraction of quenched satellite galaxies in host galaxy groups and clusters using TNG300 in the IllustrisTNG cosmological magnetohydrodynamical simulations. Simulations show that most satellites are quenched after they fall into their final hosts: post-processing is a more dominant mechanism of galaxy quenching than pre-processing. We find the fraction of quenched satellites at $z=0$ increases with host mass, which implies that more massive hosts have higher quenching efficiency because more massive hosts have more massive groups infalling. Furthermore, we find that hosts that have many early-infall satellites show a higher fraction of quenched satellites at $z=0$ than those having many late-infall satellites, which results in a scatter of the quenched fraction of satellites in a given mass range of hosts at $z=0$. Our results highlight the significance of the mass of hosts and the different infall times of satellites in understanding galaxy quenching.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We investigate the fraction of quenched satellite galaxies in host galaxy groups and clusters using TNG300 in the IllustrisTNG cosmological magnetohydrodynamical simulations. contribution 0.74 0.89 0.03 asserted 0.72
s1 Simulations show that most satellites are quenched after they fall into their final hosts: post-processing is a more dominant mechanism of galaxy quenching than pre-processing. result 0.96 0.67 0.83 asserted 1.00
s2 We find the fraction of quenched satellites at $z=0$ increases with host mass, which implies that more massive hosts have higher quenching efficiency because more massive hosts have more massive groups infalling. result 0.74 0.96 0.12 asserted 0.99
s3 Furthermore, we find that hosts that have many early-infall satellites show a higher fraction of quenched satellites at $z=0$ than those having many late-infall satellites, which results in a scatter of the quenched fraction of satellites in a given mass range of hosts at $z=0$. result 0.98 0.96 0.08 asserted 1.00
s4 Our results highlight the significance of the mass of hosts and the different infall times of satellites in understanding galaxy quenching. interpretation 0.98 0.73 0.41 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We investigate the fraction of quenched satellite galaxies in host galaxy groups and clusters using TNG300 in the IllustrisTNG cosmological magnetohydrodynamical simulations. Simulations show that most satellites are quenched after they fall into their final hosts: post-processing is a more dominant mechanism of galaxy quenching than pre-processing. We find the fraction of quenched satellites at $z=0$ increases with host mass, which implies that more massive hosts have higher quenching efficiency because more massive hosts have more massive groups infalling. Furthermore, we find that hosts that have many early-infall satellites show a higher fraction of quenched satellites at $z=0$ than those having many late-infall satellites, which results in a scatter of the quenched fraction of satellites in a given mass range of hosts at $z=0$. Our results highlight the significance of the mass of hosts and the different infall times of satellites in understanding galaxy quenching.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 4 sentences without a confident label

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.