Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DocTr: Document Transformer for Structured Information Extraction in Documents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.07929 v1 pith:GXS7GZTP submitted 2023-07-16 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords entitydocumentsformulationaimsanchorboundingdoctrdocument
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a new formulation for structured information extraction (SIE) from visually rich documents. It aims to address the limitations of existing IOB tagging or graph-based formulations, which are either overly reliant on the correct ordering of input text or struggle with decoding a complex graph. Instead, motivated by anchor-based object detectors in vision, we represent an entity as an anchor word and a bounding box, and represent entity linking as the association between anchor words. This is more robust to text ordering, and maintains a compact graph for entity linking. The formulation motivates us to introduce 1) a DOCument TRansformer (DocTr) that aims at detecting and associating entity bounding boxes in visually rich documents, and 2) a simple pre-training strategy that helps learn entity detection in the context of language. Evaluations on three SIE benchmarks show the effectiveness of the proposed formulation, and the overall approach outperforms existing solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Survey on Question Answering over Visually Rich Documents: Methods, Challenges, and Trends

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured overview of question answering over visually rich documents, comparing encoding, vision-only, and multi-page methods, and highlighting comparability issues in existing benchmarks.

Pith tools