Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Data-driven Improved Sampling in PET

Medical Physics · Submitted 17 Jul 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The procedure is able to reduce significantly the impact of depth-of-interaction in large crystals, and to improve the spatial resolution.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2307.08335 (version 1)
Pith IDSVMPVDOC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlejandro Lopez-Montes, Joaquin L Herraiz, Jose M Udias, Pablo Galve, Stephen C Moore. "Data-driven Improved Sampling in PET." arXiv:2307.08335 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/SVMPVDOC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,836 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.33 · human participants 0.17 · controlled comparison 0.85 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.29 · compares with prior results 0.91 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanners are usually designed with the goal to obtain the best compromise between sensitivity, resolution, field-of-view size, and cost. Therefore, it is difficult to improve the resolution of a PET scanner with hardware modifications, without affecting some of the other important parameters. Iterative image reconstruction methods such as the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm are able to obtain some resolution recovery by using a realistic system response matrix that includes all the relevant physical effects. Nevertheless, this resolution recovery is often limited by reduced sampling in the projection space, determined by the geometry of the detector. The goal of this work is to improve the resolution beyond the detector size limit by increasing the sampling with data-driven interpolated data. A maximum-likelihood estimation of the counts in each virtual sub-line-of-response (subLOR) is obtained after a complete image reconstruction, conserving the statistics of the initial data set. The new estimation is used for the next complete reconstruction. The method typically requires two or three of these full reconstructions (superiterations). We have evaluated it with simulations and real acquisitions for the Argus and Super Argus preclinical PET scanners manufactured by SMI, considering different types of increased sampling. Quantitative measurements of recovery and resolution evolution against noise per iteration for the standard OSEM and successive superiterations show promising results. The procedure is able to reduce significantly the impact of depth-of-interaction in large crystals, and to improve the spatial resolution. The proposed method is quite general and it can be applied to other scanners and configurations.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanners are usually designed with the goal to obtain the best compromise between sensitivity, resolution, field-of-view size, and cost. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.96
s1 Therefore, it is difficult to improve the resolution of a PET scanner with hardware modifications, without affecting some of the other important parameters. background 0.94 0.08 0.02 asserted 0.88
s2 Iterative image reconstruction methods such as the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm are able to obtain some resolution recovery by using a realistic system response matrix that includes all the relevant physical effects. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 asserted 0.70
s3 Nevertheless, this resolution recovery is often limited by reduced sampling in the projection space, determined by the geometry of the detector. background 0.74 0.09 0.03 asserted 0.76
s4 The goal of this work is to improve the resolution beyond the detector size limit by increasing the sampling with data-driven interpolated data. contribution 0.97 0.27 0.10 asserted 0.93
s5 A maximum-likelihood estimation of the counts in each virtual sub-line-of-response (subLOR) is obtained after a complete image reconstruction, conserving the statistics of the initial data set. method 1.00 0.83 0.05 asserted 1.00
s6 The new estimation is used for the next complete reconstruction. method 1.00 0.46 0.04 asserted 0.99
s7 The method typically requires two or three of these full reconstructions (superiterations). method 0.99 0.54 0.04 asserted 0.86
s8 We have evaluated it with simulations and real acquisitions for the Argus and Super Argus preclinical PET scanners manufactured by SMI, considering different types of increased sampling. method 0.87 0.96 0.04 asserted 0.99
s9 Quantitative measurements of recovery and resolution evolution against noise per iteration for the standard OSEM and successive superiterations show promising results. result 0.98 0.95 0.36 asserted 0.67
s10 The procedure is able to reduce significantly the impact of depth-of-interaction in large crystals, and to improve the spatial resolution. result 0.97 0.92 0.57 asserted 1.00
s11 The proposed method is quite general and it can be applied to other scanners and configurations. interpretation 0.82 0.42 0.16 asserted 0.82

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.57.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanners are usually designed with the goal to obtain the best compromise between sensitivity, resolution, field-of-view size, and cost. Therefore, it is difficult to improve the resolution of a PET scanner with hardware modifications, without affecting some of the other important parameters. Iterative image reconstruction methods such as the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm are able to obtain some resolution recovery by using a realistic system response matrix that includes all the relevant physical effects. Nevertheless, this resolution recovery is often limited by reduced sampling in the projection space, determined by the geometry of the detector. The goal of this work is to improve the resolution beyond the detector size limit by increasing the sampling with data-driven interpolated data. A maximum-likelihood estimation of the counts in each virtual sub-line-of-response (subLOR) is obtained after a complete image reconstruction, conserving the statistics of the initial data set. The new estimation is used for the next complete reconstruction. The method typically requires two or three of these full reconstructions (superiterations). We have evaluated it with simulations and real acquisitions for the Argus and Super Argus preclinical PET scanners manufactured by SMI, considering different types of increased sampling. Quantitative measurements of recovery and resolution evolution against noise per iteration for the standard OSEM and successive superiterations show promising results. The procedure is able to reduce significantly the impact of depth-of-interaction in large crystals, and to improve the spatial resolution. The proposed method is quite general and it can be applied to other scanners and configurations.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.