REVIEW 2 cited by
Amortized Variational Inference: When and Why?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In a probabilistic latent variable model, factorized (or mean-field) variational inference (F-VI) fits a separate parametric distribution for each latent variable. Amortized variational inference (A-VI) instead learns a common inference function, which maps each observation to its corresponding latent variable's approximate posterior. Typically, A-VI is used as a step in the training of variational autoencoders, however it stands to reason that A-VI could also be used as a general alternative to F-VI. In this paper we study when and why A-VI can be used for approximate Bayesian inference. We derive conditions on a latent variable model which are necessary, sufficient, and verifiable under which A-VI can attain F-VI's optimal solution, thereby closing the amortization gap. We prove these conditions are uniquely verified by simple hierarchical models, a broad class that encompasses many models in machine learning. We then show, on a broader class of models, how to expand the domain of AVI's inference function to improve its solution, and we provide examples, e.g. hidden Markov models, where the amortization gap cannot be closed.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Deep Active Inference Agents for Delayed and Long-Horizon Environments
A policy-conditional world model trained under active inference enables single-lookahead planning over hundreds of steps and beats a DQN baseline on energy-efficient control of parallel machines.
-
Density-Informed Pseudo-Counts for Calibrated Evidential Deep Learning
DIP-EDL sets Dirichlet pseudo-counts to the product of marginal input density and learned class probabilities, concentrating on the true label distribution while sending OOD inputs to the prior.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.