Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Latent Utility Q-Learning for Preference-Adaptive Dynamic Treatment Regimes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.12022 v3 pith:CVYGC7EP submitted 2023-07-22 stat.ML cs.LGstat.ME

classification stat.MLcs.LGstat.ME
keywords outcomeq-learningtreatmentdynamiclatentluq-learningmethodsmultiple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Optimizing individualized treatment sequences for patients who weigh multiple, competing outcomes differently poses a challenge for dynamic treatment regime (DTR) methods, which typically assume a single univariate outcome. We propose Latent Utility Q-Learning (LUQ-Learning), which estimates DTRs optimizing patient-specific preference-weighted combinations of multivariate outcomes $\mathbf{Y}\in\mathbb{R}^d$ across $K$ decision points. A conditional mean factorization decouples preference estimation from outcome regression, enabling flexible, modular learning under imperfectly observed and heterogeneous preferences without requiring explicit outcome ranking by patients. We establish consistency of the estimated value function and derive unified $\epsilon$-optimality guarantees that bound policy value loss in terms of posterior preference uncertainty, yielding interpretable criteria for data-driven policy selection. Simulations calibrated to Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) demonstrate that LUQ-Learning outperforms Q-learning with naive outcome aggregation, last-reported satisfaction optimization, and existing preference-based methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools