Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Generative Models, Synthetic Tabular Data, and Differential Privacy: An Overview and Synthesis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.15424 v2 pith:3QA5FZLR submitted 2023-07-28 cs.LG stat.APstat.COstat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.APstat.COstat.ML
keywords datagenerativemodelsdeepsyntheticgenerationtabulardatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This article provides a comprehensive synthesis of the recent developments in synthetic data generation via deep generative models, focusing on tabular datasets. We specifically outline the importance of synthetic data generation in the context of privacy-sensitive data. Additionally, we highlight the advantages of using deep generative models over other methods and provide a detailed explanation of the underlying concepts, including unsupervised learning, neural networks, and generative models. The paper covers the challenges and considerations involved in using deep generative models for tabular datasets, such as data normalization, privacy concerns, and model evaluation. This review provides a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in synthetic data generation and its applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High-precision medical speech recognition through synthetic data and semantic correction: UNITED-MEDASR

    eess.AS 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A synthetic-data pipeline for medical ASR reports sub-1% WER on standard benchmarks, but the reported numbers are internally inconsistent and not reproducible from the paper.

Pith tools